|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Visibility
- Invisibility |
'More
fundamentally, |
 |
 |
The inherent ambivalence of visibility, for P.Phelan is summoning
surveillance and the law, provoking voyeurism, fetishism, the colonialist/imperial
appetite for possessionis. This is partly revealed, when remembered
that transperency usualy is presumed to show the real intention of
the seen object. It neglects the construction of the visible, that
means that only what actually is known can as well be seen. |
 |
... conceiving of information as a thing separate from the medium
that instantiates it is a prior imaginary act that constructs a holistic
phenomenon as a matter/information duality'
N.Katherine Hayles in 'The Digital Dialectic' |
With which 'eyes' does technology
see, what issues are laying behind the programming?
|
D.Haraway simply and quite positively put it this way: 'The machine
is us, our processes, an aspect of our embodiment. We can be responsible
for machines; they do not dominate or threaten us. We are responsible
for boundaries; we are they.(A Cyborg Manifesto)'
chromagan
Audiovisual transmissions have to be understood, if they at least
can be taken for some reference, more likely as an electronical detection,
and therefore a transformation of the surrounding world for the purpose
of technological sight.
(M.P. Spangenberg)
Digital Imagery Exploitation and Production System
Thus it has to be distinguished that because of the involvement of
electronic machines we but have reached another level of constructing
visiblity, though yet technological sight cannot be taken as a given
fact of truth. It is a distribution, in which we are deeply entailed.
The Distribution of perception ranges in a very wide field from:
Imaging
Space
Public
Eye
up to
Worldwide
images for your desktop
and probably some more useful purposes:
Natural
Hazards
Some extreme consequences can be seen in military development.
Smart
Bombs
|
 |
So there has
to be also attention to what comes out of sight because of a new,
or as we believe to think enhanced visibility. Substantially there
is already human-machine distribution or interacting-influence, which
makes obvious that it is an illusion that information can be separated
from materiality. It leads to a dangerous split between information
and meaning, ignoring the fact that the development of technology
is not proceeding without feedback influences.The way computers work
technologically can not really be controlled by humans. Virtually
nothing is really to be seen on the basis of code. |
Are you able to encode this? It is a GPS
measuring published by Nasa in cooperation with Southern California
Earthquake Center (SCEC).
|
 |
Exactly here
another field is opened up - everything now can be related to everything.This
has been a further important, however provoking human-machinic influence,
as neural networks in particular have been successful in teaching
machines to recognize complex visual phenomena.
The important point is that in both these instances programming becomes
the experimental production of nonlinear effects of emergence and
self-organisation, effects that converge or resonate with fundamental
aspects of Deleuze`s philosophy. |
Measuring space with algorythmic methods
has been becoming essential in remodelling architecture. |
 |
J.Johnston
concludes, living today in the vast and multiply networked telecommunications
assemblages functions Deleuze labels virtual have simply been taken
up by less noticeable machines and functions that were formerly attributed
to the brain have been autonomized in machines operating as parts
of highly distributed systems.
In short the brain itself has become a deterritorialized organ. Today
networking systems as well as humans connected via computers exchange
digital data and lead this way obviously to an omni-linearity within
the data matrix. Developing from this source and expanding within
it the visualization of former invisible objects has been gaining
great attention.
for more: download
thesis. |
A robot`s 360
degree view.
Controlling
Autonomous Robots
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|