>> introduction
short
overview >> seeing
things/ knowledge
produktion >> PCM/
'Visibility
is a trap' >> Latour
- Pasteur/
the
scientific image >> Abstraction/
the paradox
status
of the visual abstract
>> Conclusion/
outlining
along two strings
----------------
>> Print entire
text
(4 pages)
pdf
or .rtf
----------------
>> movies
(select the format)
1. tv war coverage
> mov
> wmv
2. this
excerpt had
been transmitted
in two versions:
a pixelated one
> mov
> wmv
and a clear
one
> mov
> wmv |
Abstraction:
The complications coming with abstraction are quite obvious when ‘in
the war of cameras, radar and sensors against S.Hussein only one side
can see’[10], the same occurred in the ‘nintendo-images
von Belgrade’[11] , Kabul ... or to remember the
images of the ‘operational strokes’ of gulf-war in 1991: ‘at
certain moments even colour was abstracted from the scene, leaving the
field entirely to line and light: first, the grid and coordinate numbers
that turned the television screens of tens of millions into a bomb-sight;
then, the blossoming brilliance that over-whelmed the video camera’s
sensors and wiped the screen clean - an ultimate self-censoring erasure,
in which destruction veiled itself. The more realistic images - that is,
the minimally less abstract images –came even later.'[12]
Abstraction, which needs interpretation - here the whole myth about technological
sight as delivering scientific images, and thus objectivity, is implemented.
On a different level, but with similar intentional purpose operate the
hardly recognizable videos of bin Laden or the Djerba incident. Again,
like in smart bomb transmissions the simple layering of numbers, letters
and other signs allow or better suggest readability, which but is highly
predefined. (Also the presentation of C.Powell at the UNO in February
03 to establish evidence for a war on Iraq has to be mentioned here.)
This abstraction corresponds perfectly to the increasing difficulty evolving
from the paradox status of scientific images. In fact they can not be read
without scientific interpretation, standing alone for themselves they have
no referent, no meaning - they are no ‘pure representations’.[13]
Similar comments about the undetermination of satellite transmissions are
given by L.Parks,
when she explains her expression of codes of orbital sight and the usually
involved habits of power.
‘To have another meaning than that of their own omniscience satellite-images
have to be taken into discursive exchange. .. Instead of concentrating on
a seemingly satellite-panoptism, one could ask, how the sight of satellites
has been used to produce codes of an orbital visuality.’[14]
Already these few examples show, that the defining criteria of the visual
abstract image are going to be transformed onto almost any material of visualisation,
especially in the area of mass media. It even becomes more evident if we
take a look at the devices employed and the methods applied. Leading to
a evident connection of the dictate of dominant cultural forms of the west,
which still define diverse cultural representation and identity from this
predefined/coded material or better extremely centred point of view. Due
to this fact is also the inherent restriction of possibilities of 'visible'
self-definitions for other forms/cultures.
[10] Schnittstelle, Spangenberg, P.M.., p.207
[11] Imagineering, Terkessidis, M., p.120
[12] In/different Spaces, Burgin, V., p.231
[13] Icococlash, Latour, B., p.26, 67
[14] Imagineering, Parks, L., p.64,66, Interview with
T.Holert
|
>>> click into the images to enlarge

layered tv transmission
c.powell's UN presentation 05.02.2003
www publication of satellite image

tv transmission |