hm .. originally related to the former post and to find some more clearing aspects around the term ‘precarious’ I just had to realize that there already readers to be published around the theme intending the same on more profound level: metamute has just put together a specific reader on ‘precarious’ compiling two former issues. … the general introduction reads alike:
The attempt is to view the now often used terminology from different angles and especially Angela Mitropoulos’ article ‘Precari-us?’ might help to grasp some idea of usage or misusage, which eventually just relates to the inherent ambivalence of the yet almost unfixed … (my interpretation as I follow her turn around the term):
[continuing on:]
…Yet, capitalism is perpetually in crisis. Capital is precarious, and normally so. Stability here has always entailed formalising relative advantages between workers, either displacing crises onto the less privileged, or deferring the effects of those crises through debt. …
[to:]
…. precarity might well have us teetering, it might even do so evocatively, for better and often worse, praying for guarantees and, at times, shields that often turn out to be fortresses. But it is yet to dispense with, for all its normative expressions, a relationship to the adjective: to movement, however uncertain. ‘Precarious’ is as much a description of patterns of worktime as it is the description, experience, hopes and fears of a faltering movement  in more senses than one, and possibly since encountering the limits of the anti-summit protests. …
.. approaches on various levels tried to approach the terminology …
definition via European Cross-National Research And Policy …
via mayday …
.. and nice inventive enterprises like yomango (translates to: I steal) … because you cant buy happiness …
Precarious people are now the corner-stone of the wealth production process. Notwithstanding this, we are invisible and count for nothing in the traditional forms of social and political representation or in the European agenda. |